The Connection

  • #CRCcampus: Want to share your photos and tweets with us? Use the hashtag #CRCcampus

Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining

Courtesy Photo

Courtesy Photo

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Antoine Fuqua’s “Magnificent Seven” is the newest installation in a franchise built upon bridging the gap between “reimagining” and “remake.” A “reimagining” of John Sturges’ 1960 film of the same name, which was itself a “reimagining” of Akira Kurosawa’s “Seven Samurai” (1954), “Magnificent Seven” understands that adapting a story for a new audience means keeping the heart of the story the same while changing the body of characters.

Set in the fictional Sacramento Valley town of Rose Creek in the 1870’s, an industrialist named Bartholomew Bogue (Peter Sarsgaard) has taken the gold-rich town from its townspeople, and is not above having his men murder people in the street to keep it. Two residents, Emma Cullen (Haley Bennett) and Teddy Q (Luke Grimes), hire bounty hunter Sam Chisolm (Denzel Washington) and enlist him to assemble a band of men from around Northern California to take their town back from Bogue and his army.

One of many changes “Magnificent Seven” makes from its sources is its attempt at a realistic portrayal of the ethnically-diverse American West. Of the seven main characters, four are people of color: protagonist Sam Chisolm, outlaw Vasquez (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo), knife expert Billy Rocks (Byung-hun Lee), and warrior Red Harvest (Martin Sensmeier). The cast is completed by gambler Joshua Faraday (Chris Pratt), sharpshooter ‘Goodnight’ Robicheaux (Ethan Hawke), and skinner Jack Horne (Vincent D’Onofrio).

But a diverse cast is just part of what it takes to make a movie with a respectful and accurate representation of people of color. “Magnificent Seven” took that first step, but in the process highlights that a lack of diversity is a symptom of a much bigger racial problem in American media – ignorance.

The choice to include a Comanche warrior in Northern California, rather than a member of a local nation, is baffling, yet never properly addressed. And the film’s lasting message on race relations and internal discrimination should be questioned when Red Harvest kills the only other Native American character (also a hired gun, but for the “bad” side) while calling him a disgrace in what we’re supposed to assume is a shared language.

But where the writing was quick to identify Red Harvest as Comanche, there is a sudden lack of specifics for the character of Billy Rocks. There is an entire scene dedicated to talking about how and why the character of Robicheaux became partners with an East Asian trick shooter, but the entire conversation skirts around identifying exactly what ethnicity Billy is. Instead, the writers chose to have the characters refer to him several times as being from the “mystic Orient,” even while condemning such language.

Like most modern revisionist Westerns, the film’s true strength lies in its cinematography. There are plenty of crisp, highly contrasted colors and gorgeously-framed landscapes. These are only slightly blighted by several instances where Fuqua experiments with shot styles and focus in the first half of the movie.

The action of the opening sequence is filled with moments where the movement and sources of dialogue are held in the center of the frame, but kept out of focus, while holding the focus on empty spaces in the corner of the screen.

There is also a jarring moment when the character Faraday is introduced and we are suddenly thrust into a shaky, point-of-view shot from his perspective, which is held for a full minute before returning to normal.

Thankfully, Fuqua abandons these trials by the third act, and the strong mise-en-scène (the way that objects are placed in the frame to add to the story) carries viewers through the confusion.

But viewers from Northern California may have to suspend disbelief, as it appears that neither Fuqua nor his location scout have ever set foot in the Sacramento Valley. The sandstone canyons and rolling sand dunes makes one wonder why the story was not just set in New Mexico, where it was filmed.

“Magnificent Seven” is a well-made film that can stand on its own two feet. All of the actors deliver solid performances, and despite failures of writing and direction, it is full of action and interesting characterizations. There is no room in the two-hour run time for the viewer to lose interest.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining

    All Access

    New champagne bar opens and it’s all the ‘Fizz’

  • Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining

    Arts & Entertainment

    Puente project honors past through celebration

  • Features

    Safe Spaces emphasizes support for students

  • Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining

    Breaking News

    Keep calm and get your cuddle on!

  • Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining

    Campus Life

    Philanthropy Friends of CRC focuses on increasing a fundraising presence in the community

  • Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining

    Arts & Entertainment

    ‘The Hate U Give’ pays homage to #BlackLivesMatter

  • Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining

    Breaking News

    Chalk it Up event brings awareness to domestic violence

  • Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining

    Arts & Entertainment

    Theatre departments debuts Romeo and Juliet for a limited time

  • Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining

    Features

    Alumnus returns to campus as English professor

  • Campus Life

    Student Discounts: What You’re Missing Out

The award-winning news site of Cosumnes River College
Actors impress in ‘Magnificent Seven’ reimagining